Ircam-Centre Pompidou

Recherche

  • Recherche simple
  • Recherche avancée

    Panier électronique

    Votre panier ne contient aucune notice

    Connexion à la base

  • Identification
    (Identifiez-vous pour accéder aux fonctions de mise à jour. Utilisez votre login-password de courrier électronique)

    Entrepôt OAI-PMH

  • Soumettre une requête

    Consulter la notice détailléeConsulter la notice détaillée
    Version complète en ligneVersion complète en ligne
    Version complète en ligne accessible uniquement depuis l'IrcamVersion complète en ligne accessible uniquement depuis l'Ircam
    Ajouter la notice au panierAjouter la notice au panier
    Retirer la notice du panierRetirer la notice du panier

  • English version
    (full translation not yet available)
  • Liste complète des articles

  • Consultation des notices


    Vue détaillée Vue Refer Vue Labintel Vue BibTeX  

    Catégorie de document Article paru dans une revue
    Titre A Robust Asymmetry in Loudness between Rising- and Falling-intensity Tones
    Auteur principal Emmanuel Ponsot
    Co-auteurs Patrick Susini, Sabine Meunier
    Paru dans Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 2015
    Comité de lecture Oui
    Année 2015
    Statut éditorial Accepté - publication en cours
    Résumé

    Tones rising in intensity over a few seconds are perceived as louder than symmetrical tones falling in intensity. However, the causes for such perceptual asymmetry, as well as its magnitude and dependency on contextual and methodological factors remain unclear. In this paper, two psychophysical experiments were conducted to measure the magnitude of this asymmetry for 2-s, 15-dB intensity-varying tones in different conditions. In the first experiment, participants assessed the global loudness of rising- and falling-intensity sounds with an absolute magnitude estimation procedure (AME); in the second experiment, they compared sounds relatively in an adaptive, two-interval, two-alternative forced-choice task (2I-2AFC). In both experiments, the region of intensity change, the design of experimental blocks, and the type of comparison stimulus were systematically manipulated to test for contextual and methodological factors. Remarkably, the asymmetry was virtually unaffected by the different contexts of presentation and similar results with 2I-2AFC and AME measurements were obtained. In addition, the size of the effect was comparable over all but the highest intensity regions (80–90 dB SPL), at which it was significantly smaller. All together, these results indicate that the loudness asymmetry is preserved under different measurement methods and contexts, and suggest that the underlying mechanism is strong and robust. In short, falling tones have to be about 4 dB higher in level than symmetrically rising tones in order to be perceived with the same global loudness, a finding that is still not predicted by current loudness models.

    Mots-clés Temporal processing / Psychoacoustics / Hearing
    Equipe Perception et design sonores
    Cotes Ponsot15a / DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0824-y

    © Ircam - Centre Pompidou 2005.